Explainer · July 30, 2026 · 5 min · By Marisol Etcheverry
Laser, IPL, or Cryotherapy for Age Spots: What the Mechanisms Actually Predict
Three of the most common in-office treatments for solar lentigines work in fundamentally different ways. Understanding those differences explains why results, risks, and candidacy vary so much from patient to patient.

Solar lentigines, the flat brown spots most people call age spots or sun spots, are among the most treated pigment lesions in dermatology. Yet patients often arrive at a consultation assuming all removal methods are interchangeable. They are not. The three most common in-office options, pigment-selective lasers, intense pulsed light, and cryotherapy, attack the same target through very different mechanisms, and those mechanisms predict most of what happens next: how many sessions you need, how the spot heals, and who is a poor candidate.
Start with what an age spot actually is. A solar lentigine is a localized overproduction and accumulation of melanin, driven by chronic ultraviolet exposure that has altered the behavior of melanocytes and the keratinocytes they supply. The pigment sits mostly in the epidermis and along the basal layer. That matters because it means the target is shallow, concentrated, and, critically, the same chromophore that gives surrounding skin its color. Every treatment below has to destroy or disperse that pigment without collateral damage to normal melanin nearby.
Pigment-selective lasers: precision through pulse duration. Q-switched and picosecond lasers deliver energy in nanoseconds or picoseconds, faster than heat can diffuse out of a melanosome. This principle, called selective photothermolysis, means the pigment granules absorb the energy, shatter or fragment, and the surrounding tissue is largely spared. Fragmented pigment is then cleared by immune cells or shed upward as the treated spot darkens, crusts lightly, and flakes off over roughly one to two weeks. For a discrete, clearly benign lentigine, a single session often produces substantial clearing, with one or two touch-ups for stubborn lesions. The tradeoff is that melanin is melanin: in deeper skin tones, the laser cannot fully distinguish lesional pigment from baseline pigment, which raises the risk of post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation or lighter halos. Test spots and conservative settings are standard practice in Fitzpatrick types IV to VI, and some clinicians avoid certain wavelengths in those patients altogether.
Intense pulsed light: broad, gentler, and cumulative. IPL is not a laser. It emits a broad spectrum of light filtered to favor absorption by melanin and hemoglobin, delivered in millisecond pulses. Those longer pulses heat pigment more gradually rather than shattering it, so the effect per session is milder. IPL shines when the problem is diffuse photodamage, meaning scattered lentigines mixed with redness and mottled tone across the face, chest, or hands, because a large treatment head covers broad areas efficiently. Expect a series, commonly three to five sessions spaced about a month apart, with spots darkening into coffee-ground flecks that slough over days. Because IPL is less selective, it demands more caution in darker or recently tanned skin, and results depend heavily on operator settings. The same device can be excellent or ineffective depending on filters, fluence, and technique.
Cryotherapy: destruction by freezing, cheap but blunt. Liquid nitrogen kills melanocytes, which are notably more cold-sensitive than surrounding keratinocytes. A brief freeze of a lentigine causes the lesion to blister subtly or crust, then peel away with its pigment. It is fast, inexpensive, and widely available. The downside follows directly from the mechanism: freezing is not selective within the lesion, and overtreatment destroys melanocytes permanently, leaving a hypopigmented white mark that can be more conspicuous than the original spot, especially on darker skin or on the backs of the hands where skin is thin. Freeze duration is measured in seconds, and outcomes vary with technique more than almost any other modality. Comparative studies have generally found pigment lasers produce better cosmetic outcomes than cryotherapy for facial lentigines, though cryotherapy remains reasonable for a small number of lesions on lighter skin.
What none of these fix. All three methods remove pigment that already exists. None changes the underlying photodamaged melanocytes' tendency to overproduce pigment again with ultraviolet exposure. Recurrence in the same spot or the appearance of new spots nearby is common within one to two years without strict photoprotection. Daily broad-spectrum sunscreen is not aftercare fine print, it is the maintenance phase of the treatment.
The step that matters more than the device. A flat brown spot is usually a lentigine, but lentigo maligna, an early form of melanoma, can look nearly identical to the untrained eye. Treating an undiagnosed melanoma with a laser or freeze does not just fail, it can erase the visible marker of a dangerous lesion and delay diagnosis. Any spot that is new, changing, irregular in color or border, or simply uncertain deserves dermoscopic evaluation, and sometimes biopsy, before anyone points a device at it.
The practical summary: lasers offer the most precision per session for discrete spots, IPL suits widespread photodamage over a series, and cryotherapy trades cost and convenience for a real risk of permanent light marks. The right choice depends on skin tone, lesion number, budget, and, above all, a confirmed benign diagnosis.
More in Explainer
View all →- IPL vs. Q-Switched Laser for Age Spots: How Each One Actually Works, and Who Each One Suits
- IPL vs. Pigment Lasers for Age Spots: What the Mechanisms Actually Predict
- IPL vs. Q-Switched Laser for Age Spots: How Each One Actually Works, and When It Matters
- IPL vs Q-Switched Lasers for Age Spots: What Actually Happens Under the Skin